Right now, every donation is matched until 31st December or until we reach our goal of £145K. Don't miss out! DONATE NOW
News
Get the latest news and updates from Animal Equality

Citizens Would Approve A Tax On Meat Production For Its Contribution To Global Warming

Livestock is causing more greenhouse gases than all the cars, trains, ships, and airplanes put together. Meat production is one of the main factors of global warming.
08/12/2015 Updated: 25/02/2019

An international study shows that introducing a tax on meat aimed at helping reduce global warming and improving health, would be greatly accepted by society. Carried out by the committee of experts from Chatham House and the University of Glasgow, the study reveals that governments are wrong to think that the measure would generate a negative response from society. Livestock is causing more greenhouse gases than all the cars, trains, ships, and airplanes put together. Meat production is one of the main factors of global warming. Meat production emits greenhouse gases that come from the digestive processes of the billions of animals used in livestock. Also, it results in the cutting down of millions of hectares of forest to create pasture for animal feed and to produce fertilisers for this land. This is in addition to the energy consumption and transport used by farmers. The study of the committee of experts has included surveys and opinion groups in 12 countries. It has been found that the tax on meat would be accepted if it were seen as public interest, as it has already happened with the taxes to tobacco. Laura Wellesley, of Chatham House, declared “the idea that measures like this are difficult to implement is not justified. Our study shows that society expects governments to lead the action on matters that are for the public good. The study also shows that any negative reaction to taking unpopular measures would be short term if the reason for the measures were justified.” “Governments are ignoring what they should be seeing as a great measure that everyone would benefit from,” she added. Participants in the 36 opinion groups were particularly positive that governments should stop subsidising the livestock industry. In fact, “a huge number of people were surprised that this industry had subsidies,” commented Catherine Happer of the University of Glasgow. However, just in the 34 countries that form the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), livestock subsidies totalled over $54 million in 2013, including about $195 per cow. Source: http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/nov/24/meat-tax-far-less-unpalatable-than-government-thinks-research-finds https://www.chathamhouse.org/publication/changing-climate-changing-diets


Latest News
05/02/2025

The news surrounding avian flu keeps coming, and the situation is becoming increasingly worrying. Earlier this month, the US reported its first human death from H5N1 – a strain of bird flu, marking a significant and tragic milestone. This individual, over 65 and with pre-existing health conditions, passed away after…
04/02/2025

On 27th November, a tribunal took place – brought by Animal Equality UK and NGO WildFish – against the UK Government to scrutinise its decision to allow the Scottish salmon industry to drop the word ‘farmed’ from its Protected Geographical Indication (PGI) name. In a move we deem “reckless”, the…
27/01/2025

The Scottish Parliament’s Rural Affairs and Islands Committee has released its findings from a follow-up inquiry into the country’s salmon farming industry. The inquiry, conducted between June and October 2024, examined the progress made since the 2018 review that exposed the devastating impact of the industry on both animals and…